Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maniac (Girlicious single)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:50, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maniac (Girlicious single)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted by Prod, non-notable, fails WP:NSONG GregJackP (talk) 11:53, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is already a page for this song which i have redirected per discussion until, when, IF, it charts. There is no need for this page. (CK...... (talk) 03:25, 12 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No actual metrics, Twitter sources, and even then the iTunes list show's it's very low. No notability. Nate • (chatter) 01:04, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The article says it charted (#89 on Canadian Hot 100). Is that true? If so, that would indicate notability. StAnselm (talk) 03:53, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment According to Billboard, the song has not charted at all. Nate • (chatter) 05:12, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Use of "single" in article's title is also incorrect per naming conventions. - eo (talk) 12:05, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.